Tank machineguns

Just imagine when you used a weapon that takes forever to charge up, like a railgun, and your surrounded. What do you do?
Use your 50 cal.

I don't think they should be mounted on the tank but i think there should be some more weapons.

How are you be able to aim with your turret and the machine gun at the same time? Besides, machine guns are for infantries not for tanks.

almost all tanks have a machinegun on them, its called google, use it.

The machine gun (or any secondary weapon for that matter) would be equipped to your tank in the garage and would aim and fire automatically. The secondary weapon would be upgradable yet still have a lower power than the primary weapons of the same tier as the secondary weapon.

Not gonna work, because we don't have infantry. Since when can the Machine gun shells penetrate the tank's heavy Armour?

1) We don't have infantry
2) Machine gun is useless against tank
3) It will be impossible to aim
4) It will create new lags

Obviously you guys haven't seen a A-10 ThunderBolts Gatling gun in action.
Google it.
6 Barrel i think, takes out light tanks.

iNubCake wrote:Obviously you guys haven't seen a A-10 ThunderBolts Gatling gun in action.
Google it.
6 Barrel i think, takes out light tanks.

I thought machine guns and Gatling guns are different.

Twins are enuf.

Who said they have to be machine guns? Plasma turrets all the way!

Pin4er163 wrote:1) We don't have infantry
2) Machine gun is useless against tank
3) It will be impossible to aim
4) It will create new lags

ever heard of metal percing bullets

O sure, Machineguns Fireing what, 1000 shots a minutes? EPIC LAG

the gun on an A-10 weighs about as much as the main gun on a tank... its a 30mm cannon. Also, the armor piercing bullets on it can only penetrate armor on older tanks. Anything built after 1970 will be impervious to its rounds. On top of that, even on an older tank the 30mm armor piercing rounds can only penetrate at a specific angle and in specific places on the side and back of the tank... not the front, which is what you'd be shooting at most of the time. Its just a bad idea all around.