Suggestions!

how about a adding friend system

ЧЯВО??

Here's a suggestion that I think most people would agree with: Could we get the crystal equivalent of our daily bonuses if we choose to do so?

^I agree. That way I could get more crystals.

A drone? A small helicopter thingy that follows your tank and attacks enemies when commanded. It can be 1 shot killed and do little damage, but it's hard to hit.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 05/04/2010 18:37:52

Hey, that's a cool idea! However, if you are within a few meters/yards of an enemy tank, won't your bullets always go to the tank and not the drone?

What if Tanki had certain classes. Like a medic, or a heavy class, using rockets n stuff.

what about a machine gun in the game

How about stop changing the strengths and weaknesses of various tanks / weapons so it is actually fair, and not just randomly make changes?

panzer-runner wrote:How about stop changing the strengths and weaknesses of various tanks / weapons so it is actually fair, and not just randomly make changes?

We reserve the right to balance characteristics of any object in the game in accordance with our view of what is good for the gameplay. Deal with it.

therussian GT (adm) wrote:

panzer-runner wrote:How about stop changing the strengths and weaknesses of various tanks / weapons so it is actually fair, and not just randomly make changes?

We reserve the right to balance characteristics of any object in the game in accordance with our view of what is good for the gameplay. Deal with it.

I am dealing with it, by making a suggestion. I guess people shouldn't suggest things here in a thread called "Suggestions" now, right? hehe

BTW, People should be aware of that fact before they ever spend any real money. It's the main reason I never will. I won't spend my hard earned money on a game that can just change the stuff around after I buy it. Balance is a subjective term, and secretly altering a game behind everyones back is certainly your right, as you said, but I have the right to suggest its not good for the game.

panzer-runner wrote:

therussian GT (adm) wrote:

panzer-runner wrote:How about stop changing the strengths and weaknesses of various tanks / weapons so it is actually fair, and not just randomly make changes?

We reserve the right to balance characteristics of any object in the game in accordance with our view of what is good for the gameplay. Deal with it.

I am dealing with it, by making a suggestion. I guess people shouldn't suggest things here in a thread called "Suggestions" now, right? hehe

BTW, People should be aware of that fact before they ever spend any real money. It's the main reason I never will. I won't spend my hard earned money on a game that can just change the stuff around after I buy it. Balance is a subjective term, and secretly altering a game behind everyones back is certainly your right, as you said, but I have the right to suggest its not good for the game.

They are aware because they've read the license agreement that they signed when registering for the game. Right? That's also why you should suggest this - there already is a response to your suggestion in the EULA, and forum rules prohibit posting on issues that have already been discussed. The main take-home point is that while the overall balance is more important than the satisfaction level of one particular player, the administration is reasonable and will not make changes that render a certain item useless.

therussian GT (adm) wrote:

panzer-runner wrote:

therussian GT (adm) wrote:

panzer-runner wrote:How about stop changing the strengths and weaknesses of various tanks / weapons so it is actually fair, and not just randomly make changes?

We reserve the right to balance characteristics of any object in the game in accordance with our view of what is good for the gameplay. Deal with it.

I am dealing with it, by making a suggestion. I guess people shouldn't suggest things here in a thread called "Suggestions" now, right? hehe

BTW, People should be aware of that fact before they ever spend any real money. It's the main reason I never will. I won't spend my hard earned money on a game that can just change the stuff around after I buy it. Balance is a subjective term, and secretly altering a game behind everyones back is certainly your right, as you said, but I have the right to suggest its not good for the game.

They are aware because they've read the license agreement that they signed when registering for the game. Right? That's also why you should suggest this - there already is a response to your suggestion in the EULA, and forum rules prohibit posting on issues that have already been discussed. The main take-home point is that while the overall balance is more important than the satisfaction level of one particular player, the administration is reasonable and will not make changes that render a certain item useless.

Ok, can you please direct me to where what I said has been discussed so that I don't discuss it, since I could not see it being discussed anywhere. And where is this EULA please?

panzer-runner wrote:

therussian GT (adm) wrote:

panzer-runner wrote:

therussian GT (adm) wrote:

panzer-runner wrote:How about stop changing the strengths and weaknesses of various tanks / weapons so it is actually fair, and not just randomly make changes?

We reserve the right to balance characteristics of any object in the game in accordance with our view of what is good for the gameplay. Deal with it.

I am dealing with it, by making a suggestion. I guess people shouldn't suggest things here in a thread called "Suggestions" now, right? hehe

BTW, People should be aware of that fact before they ever spend any real money. It's the main reason I never will. I won't spend my hard earned money on a game that can just change the stuff around after I buy it. Balance is a subjective term, and secretly altering a game behind everyones back is certainly your right, as you said, but I have the right to suggest its not good for the game.

They are aware because they've read the license agreement that they signed when registering for the game. Right? That's also why you should suggest this - there already is a response to your suggestion in the EULA, and forum rules prohibit posting on issues that have already been discussed. The main take-home point is that while the overall balance is more important than the satisfaction level of one particular player, the administration is reasonable and will not make changes that render a certain item useless.

Ok, can you please direct me to where what I said has been discussed so that I don't discuss it, since I could not see it being discussed anywhere. And where is this EULA please?

You signed it when you registered for the game. You ticked the 'i agree with the license agreement' box.

therussian GT (adm) wrote:

panzer-runner wrote:

therussian GT (adm) wrote:

panzer-runner wrote:

therussian GT (adm) wrote:

panzer-runner wrote:How about stop changing the strengths and weaknesses of various tanks / weapons so it is actually fair, and not just randomly make changes?

We reserve the right to balance characteristics of any object in the game in accordance with our view of what is good for the gameplay. Deal with it.

I am dealing with it, by making a suggestion. I guess people shouldn't suggest things here in a thread called "Suggestions" now, right? hehe

BTW, People should be aware of that fact before they ever spend any real money. It's the main reason I never will. I won't spend my hard earned money on a game that can just change the stuff around after I buy it. Balance is a subjective term, and secretly altering a game behind everyones back is certainly your right, as you said, but I have the right to suggest its not good for the game.

They are aware because they've read the license agreement that they signed when registering for the game. Right? That's also why you should suggest this - there already is a response to your suggestion in the EULA, and forum rules prohibit posting on issues that have already been discussed. The main take-home point is that while the overall balance is more important than the satisfaction level of one particular player, the administration is reasonable and will not make changes that render a certain item useless.

Ok, can you please direct me to where what I said has been discussed so that I don't discuss it, since I could not see it being discussed anywhere. And where is this EULA please?

You signed it when you registered for the game. You ticked the 'i agree with the license agreement' box.

So, let me see if I understand...
There is already a response to my suggestion that was made BEFORE I suggested it in a EULA that i read BEFORE signing up here and making the suggestion? And I can't go back and see this EULA anywhere, to see what this response to my suggestion is. Whew.... Now it all makes sense.

Thanks for clearing that up!